Carter v. Ricumstrict et al
Joel Carter |
John Does, M Mohoney, M Szappen, Smith, M Krajnik, Ricumstrict, R Huges, Piche, H Bailey and Stothard |
2:2007cv13311 |
August 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Arenac |
Steven D Pepe |
Anna Diggs Taylor |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 158 ORDER DENYING 155 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(B) and FINDING ANY APPEAL FRIVOLOUS. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe) |
Filing 147 ORDER GRANTING 141 APPLICATION FOR PRISONER TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES ON APPEAL, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 142 MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF TRANSCRIPT,andGRANTING 143 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe) |
Filing 136 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 131 132 Motions for New Trial and/or for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe) |
Filing 123 ORDER Regarding 111 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
Filing 92 ORDER granting 86 Motion for Trial by Jury - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 39 ORDER Adopting 37 Report and Recommendation Granting Defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.