Marshek v. Marske
Plaintiff: Tyson Marshek
Defendant: Matthew Marske
Case Number: 2:2007cv14407
Filed: October 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Washtenaw
Presiding Judge: Paul J Komives
Presiding Judge: Anna Diggs Taylor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation and Denying Defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)
December 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Matthew Marske Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J Komives. (EBut)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshek v. Marske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyson Marshek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Marske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?