Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated v. Hoss et al
Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated |
John C Hoss, Roy W Starbird and Checkered Flag Oil Change Center, Incorporated |
2:2007cv14463 |
October 19, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Washtenaw |
John Feikens |
Steven D Pepe |
Trademark |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 136 ORDER Adopting and Modifying 122 Report and Recommendation; Granting 111 Motion to Strike Defendants' Counterclaims filed by Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated; and Deny 114 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated on its claim of breach of the non-compete provision and Grant 114 on its breach of contract claims. Signed by District Judge John Feikens. (CCoh) |
Filing 122 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 111 MOTION to Strike 109 Answer to Amended Complaint and 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) filed by Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M) |
Filing 106 ORDER Adopting [#72] Report and Recommendation GRANTING 32 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated Signed by District Judge John Feikens. (CCoh) |
Filing 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 32 MOTION to Amend/Correct 5 Amended Complaint filed by Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Incorporated Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven D Pepe. (VSim) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.