Davis v. Warren
Petitioner: Antonio Davis
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Case Number: 4:2008cv10050
Filed: January 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Lapeer
Presiding Judge: Paul V Gadola
Presiding Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 13 Motion to Extend. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
October 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Opinion and ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss and Declining Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?