Horecek v. Seaman et al
| Daniel Horecek |
| Henry Wallace, Jane Roe, John Doe, Lori Seaman, Atkins and Michael Bouchard |
| 2:2008cv10866 |
| March 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Branch |
| Battani |
| Komives |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER Adopting Re: 89 Report and Recommendation, and Granting Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Adopting 65 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying re 37 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision filed by Lori Seaman, Atkins, Henry Wallace, John Doe, Jane Roe, Michael Bouchard. Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (BThe)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 17 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Lori Seaman, Atkins, Henry Wallace, Michael Bouchard; 26 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Daniel Horacek Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (BThe)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lori Seaman, Atkins, Henry Wallace, Michael Bouchard, 26 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Daniel Horacek Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J Komives. (EBut)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
