Loesel et al v. Frankenmuth, City of
Plaintiff: Ronald Loesel and Arthur Loesel
Defendant: Frankenmuth, City of
Case Number: 2:2008cv11131
Filed: March 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Genesee
Presiding Judge: Pepe
Presiding Judge: Taylor
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 239 Opinion and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 227 Motion for Entry of Judgment and Assessment of Fees; granting 233 Motion to Strike and Striking Response. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 209 Opinion and ORDER denying 194 Motion in Limine; denying 195 Motion in Limine; granting 196 Motion in Limine; denying 197 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
August 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 187 Opinion and ORDER denying 172 Motion for Judgment; granting 173 Motion to Vacate 164 Order; denying 174 Motion to Amend/Correct Witness List for Trial. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ORDER Granting Motion for Assessment of Interest and Determining Pre-Judgment Interest. Motion terminated: 96 MOTION For Entry of Judgment and Assessment of Interest, Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER granting in part 96 MOTION For Entry of Judgment and Assessment of Interest, Attorney Fees and Costs, denying as moot 138 MOTION to Quash and Ordering Supplemental Briefing. Set Motion Deadlines as to 96 MOTION For Entry of Judgment and Assessment of Interest, Attorney Fees and Costs: (Three page supplemental briefs due by 8/6/2012). Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER denying 110 Motion for Judgment; denying 128 Motion to Strike; Granting in part, denying in part 96 and Scheduling for Evidentiary Hearing in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Judgment and Assessment of Attorneys Fees, Interest and Costs and Scheduling Telephonic Status Conference. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loesel et al v. Frankenmuth, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Loesel
Represented By: Andrew Kochanowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Loesel
Represented By: Andrew Kochanowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frankenmuth, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?