Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N.V.E., Inc.
Plaintiff: Innovation Ventures, LLC
Defendant: N.V.E., Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv11867
Filed: May 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Scheer
Presiding Judge: Zatkoff
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 479 POST TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. See image for dates. (AChu)
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 478 JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant. Judgment in the amount of $10,616,992.19. Approved by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 447 ORDER RESOLVING 408 , 411 , 418 and 442 Motions in Limine. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 436 ORDER GRANTING 406 Leave to Allow Jacoby Rebuttal to the New Saral Report. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 404 ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)
October 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 302 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 284 MOTION TO STRIKETWO OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORTS ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (Ciesla, C)
March 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 273 ORDER denying as moot (249) Sealed Motion in case 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-MAR. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-MAR, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MVer)
December 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 267 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for (235 in 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 234 in 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM, 256 in 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-MAR) Report and Recommendation, (192 in 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-MAR, 171 in 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 170 in 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM) Sealed Motion,, filed by NVE, Incorporated Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-MAR, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MVer)
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 256 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (192 in 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ -MAR, 171 in 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 170 in 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM) SEALED MOTION Sanctions by NVE, Incorporated. filed by NVE, Incorporated Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ -MAR, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (Miles, M)
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 240 OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ -MAR, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (CGre)
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 233 ORDER granting (134) Motion for Leave to File; denying (148) Motion to Strike; granting (186) Motion for Leave to File; granting (201) Motion for Leave to File; granting (206) Motion for Leave to File in case 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS; granting (113) Mo tion for Leave to File; denying (127) Motion to Strike; granting (165) Motion for Leave to File; granting (180) Motion for Leave to File; granting (185) Motion for Leave to File in case 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS; denying (126) Motion to Strike; granting (164) Motion for Leave to File; granting (179) Motion for Leave to File; granting (184) Motion for Leave to File in case 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MVer)
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDER re (175 in 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM, 176 in 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 197 in 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS) Sealed Document - Other,,, filed by Innovation Ventures, LLC, (196 in 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM, 218 in 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS, 197 in 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS) Objection, filed by Innovation Ventures, LLC. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MVer)
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER denying (196) Sealed Motion in case 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS; denying (175) Sealed Motion in case 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS; denying (174) Sealed Motion in case 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MLan)
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER denying (75) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS; denying (58) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS; denying (57) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-11867-LPZ-DAS, 2:08-cv-13287-SFC-DAS, 2:08-cv-13859-PDB-VMM (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N.V.E., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovation Ventures, LLC
Represented By: Marc Lorelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N.V.E., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?