Watson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
David Watson |
SRF Medical Department, Regional Health Care Administrator, Goldberger, Michigan Department of Corrections and SRF Medical Staff |
2:2008cv12873 |
July 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Saginaw |
Binder |
Cleland |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 45 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, granting 44 MOTION for Leave to File Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (PPau) |
Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER denying 37 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 34 OPINION and ORDER Overruling 32 Objection to Report and Recommendation, and 33 Response (Objection to R&R), Adopting 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Denying 25 MOTION to Amend, Granting 20 MOTION to Dismiss 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), and 23 Motion to Dismiss. Dismissing defendant SRF Medical Department and Dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (NHol) |
Filing 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Regional Health Care Administrator, SRF Medical Staff, Michigan Department of Corrections, be granted; that 25 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by David Watson, be denied; and 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Goldberger be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.