Brancaccio v. Warren
Petitioner: Michael Brancaccio
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Case Number: 2:2008cv14116
Filed: September 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Lapeer
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Komives
Presiding Judge: Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DENYING re 17 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Michael Brancaccio, AND ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Brancaccio. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brancaccio v. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Brancaccio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Represented By: Linus R. Banghart-Linn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?