Thompson v. Rapelje
Petitioner: Christopher Thompson
Respondent: Lloyd W Rapelje
Case Number: 2:2009cv10520
Filed: February 12, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Saginaw
Presiding Judge: Borman
Presiding Judge: Komives
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration re 12 Order. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying re 11 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION and ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Rapelje
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lloyd W Rapelje
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?