Babb v. McQuiggin
Petitioner: Thomas Babb
Respondent: Greg McQuiggin
Case Number: 2:2009cv11804
Filed: May 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Binder
Presiding Judge: Cohn
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (CGre)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER dismissing 7 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; dismissing 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babb v. McQuiggin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Greg McQuiggin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?