Hunter v. Howes
Petitioner: William Hunter
Respondent: Carol Howes
Case Number: 2:2009cv12562
Filed: June 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Branch
Presiding Judge: Battani
Presiding Judge: Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion to Amend the Habeas Petition, Denying the Petition and Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability, but Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Hunter. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunter v. Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carol Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?