Tompkins v. Crown Corr, Inc. et al
| Lela Tompkins |
| Crown Corr, Inc., Detroit Metropolitan Airport, Northwest Airlines, Hunt Construction Group, Inc. and Kimco Corporation |
| 2:2010cv10413 |
| January 29, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Wayne |
| Friedman |
| Whalen |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
OPINION and ORDER denying 144 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff to Execute Authorizations filed by Northwest Airlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
171
MODIFIED OPINION and ORDER granting Crown Corr., Inc.'s and Hunt Construction Group,Inc.'s joint 81 MOTION for Summary Judgment Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (CMul)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER GRANTING 136 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (MWil)
|
|
Filing
129
OPINION and ORDER granting 81 MOTION for Summary Judgment after reconsideration Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (CMul)
|
|
Filing
115
MODIFIED MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Granting Crown Corr, Inc's and Hunt Construction Group, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Bernard A Friedman. (PMil)
|
|
Filing
111
OPINION and ORDER Granting 81 Crown Corr, Inc.'s and Hunt Construction Group, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Bernard A Friedman. (FMos)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
