Saffady v. Chase Home Finance, Inc. et al
Gregory J Saffady |
Chase Home Finance, Inc. and PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
2:2010cv11965 |
May 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Bernard A Friedman |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDER Denying Chase's Request for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer) |
Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; FURTHER ORDERING that Michael Tindall file a copy of this Opinion and Order with the Wayne County Register of Deeds; FURTHER ORDERING that Chase Home Finance's Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer) |
Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) |
Filing 53 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND OPINION AND ORDER denying 27 Motion for Exparte Order; denying 28 Motion to File an Amended Complaint; denying for lack of merit 38 Motion for Contempt; denying without predjudice 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; denyin g for lack of merit 19 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying for lack of merit 24 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 29 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 32 Motion for Leave to File. SHOW CAUSE RESPONSE DUE BY 10/21/2010. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.