Bemer v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
Jeff Bemer |
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Harris, Lugwig, Anderson, K. Nimr Ikram, M Wolcott, Deborah Cary, Audberto C. Antonini, Krishn Mohan, Maureen N. Onuigbo, John R. Kearney and Sasikala Vemulapalli |
2:2010cv12228 |
June 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Jackson |
Stephen J Murphy |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 ORDER Adopting 118 Report and Recommendation; Overruling Objection 119 ; and Granting Defendants' Dispositive Motions: 109 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Lugwig, Anderson, Deborah Cary, 76 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judg ment,, filed by Audberto C. Antonini, 86 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by Maureen N. Onuigbo, Krishn Mohan, Correctional Medical Services Inc., 79 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by John R. Kearney, 97 Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, filed by Prison Health Services, Incorporated, John R. Kearney, 75 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Sasikala Vemulapalli Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Filing 74 ORDER Adopting 67 Report and Recommendation - Granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by M Wolcott,and Granting 17 Motion to Dismiss filed by K. Nimr Ikram Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.