Sosa et al v. Detroit, City of et al
| Caleb Sosa and Amparo Hernandez-Sosa |
| Jane/John Doe, Dwight Pearson, Gary Diaz, Denny Borg, Benjamin Koyton and Detroit, City of |
| 2:2010cv12878 |
| July 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Sean F Cox |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER Denying 32 MOTION to Set Aside (Motion for Reconsideration) re 31 Order filed by Detroit, City of, Dwight Pearson. ( Evidentiary Hearing on Damages set for 4/9/2012 09:30 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Set Aside Defaults as to Defendants Gary Diaz, Denny Borg and Benjamin Koyton. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION to Set Aside default filed by Detroit, City of, Dwight Pearson. ( Evidentiary Hearing to Determine Damages set for 2/16/2012 04:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 10 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 5 Motion for Default Judgment Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
