Lossia v. Detroit Public Schools et al
| Evelyn Lossia |
| Detroit Public Schools, Detroit Board of Education, Robert Bobb, Teresa N Gueyser, NAOMI LEWIS, GLADYS WALLACE, ANGELA BROADEN, LAURIE WASHINGTON and RAMON JONES |
| 2:2011cv12607 |
| June 15, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| Sean F. Cox |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER STRIKING 48 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice filed by Evelyn Lossia, GRANTING Attorney Marla Linderman's Request to Withdraw as Counsel re 50 MOTION for Reconsideration re 37 MOTION to Withdraw , and SET TING BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 1/2/2013). Motions terminated: 49 Emergency MOTION to Seal, 60 Emergency MOTION for Order Waiving FRCP 11 and MRCP 3.3, to extend deadline and/or for alternative relief filed by Evelyn Lossia. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
