Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Andrus Acoustical, Inc. et al
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds |
Andrus Acoustical, Inc., Sterling Millwork, Inc., Alan Andrus and Mark Bolitho |
2:2011cv14656 |
October 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Paul D. Borman |
Laurie J. Michelson |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 153 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 152 OPINION AND ORDER denying 114 MOTION TO AMEND DAMAGES FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL, MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 111 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 87 AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 86 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Sealed Motion. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.