Avendt et al v. Covidien Inc.
Robert Avendt and Karol Avendt |
Covidien Inc. |
2:2011cv15538 |
December 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Paul D. Borman |
Mona K. Majzoub |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 234 OPINION AND ORDER Excluding Certain Testimony of Plaintiff's Treating Physician, Denying 109 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Denying as Moot 110 Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Ancell ; Denying as Moot 113 Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Hammel ; Granting 116 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Complaint with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 219 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 130 Motion to limit opinions and testimony of Dr. Michael J. Rosen and Setting a Daubert hearing. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
Filing 103 ORDER Entered 99 Motion Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification of Scheduling Order - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion to Strike- Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 77 ORDER denying 49 Motion for Clarification and for Extension - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting in part 23 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.