Glassbrook v. Rose Acceptance, Inc. et al
| Sharon Glassbrook |
| Rose Acceptance, Inc., First National Bank of America and National Acceptance Company |
| 2:2013cv10152 |
| January 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Lapeer |
| Robert H. Cleland |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (LWag)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER STRIKING 50 Response to Motion filed by Sharon Glassbrook, DENYING AS MOOT 49 MOTION for Leave to File A Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration filed by Sharon Glassbrook, DENYING 48 MOTION for Reconsideration re 42 Order on Motion to Dismiss filed by First National Bank of America, Rose Acceptance, Inc. and DIRECTING the parties to file a joint Rule 269f) discovery plan by 2/11/2014. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER SUSPENDING Deadlines and Motion Practice and Directing Parties to Appear at a ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 1/28/2014 10:30 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
