Little v. Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Little
Defendant: Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv10311
Filed: January 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 DECISION Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (CBet)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Little v. Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Little
Represented By: Caitlin E. Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
Represented By: William B. Forrest
Represented By: Thomas G. Kienbaum
Represented By: Sheryl A. Laughren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?