Mungar v. Burt
Petitioner:
Thomas Mungar
Respondent:
Sherry Burt
Case Number:
2:2013cv11366
Filed:
March 27, 2013
Court:
Michigan Eastern District Court
County:
Muskegon
Referring Judge:
Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge:
Victoria A. Roberts
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (General)
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| January 22, 2016 | 13 |
OPINION AND ORDER Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability; and Granting Petitioner Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mungar v. Burt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Mungar | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sherry Burt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.