Brown v. Romanowski

Petitioner: Ryan Brown
Respondent: Ken Romanowski
Case Number: 2:2013cv11367
Filed: March 27, 2013
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: Sean F. Cox
Referring Judge: Charles E. Binder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 17, 2015 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying Petitioner's 16 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
July 1, 2015 13 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Certificate of Appealability, and Granting Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Romanowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ken Romanowski
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?