August v. Manley Toys LTD

Plaintiff: Mitch August
Defendant: Manley Toys LTD
Case Number: 2:2013cv13894
Filed: September 12, 2013
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Paul D. Borman
Referring Judge: Paul J. Komives
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1330
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 10, 2015 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING IN PART and denying in part 26 Motion to Extend ; GRANTING IN PART and denying in part 30 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
November 12, 2014 10 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: August v. Manley Toys LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitch August
Represented By: John J. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manley Toys LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?