Vertin v. Hatty
Plaintiff: Dennis Vertin
Defendant: Michael P Hatty
Case Number: 2:2013cv15110
Filed: December 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Lapeer
Presiding Judge: Gershwin A. Drain
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Randon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT[#10]. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING THE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vertin v. Hatty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael P Hatty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Vertin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?