Christenson et al v. Michigan, State of et al
James Christenson and Christenson Law Trust |
Michigan, State of, Roseville, City of, James Osterhout and Timothy D. Tomlinson |
2:2015cv14441 |
December 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Macomb |
Elizabeth A. Stafford |
George Caram Steeh |
Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER denying plaintiffs' Motion to clarify 44 , denying motion to enter evidence 47 and enjoining plaintiffs from filing further motions and requests in this lawsuit without leave of court. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 43 ORDER denying 41 plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 42 defendants' Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying 38 defendants' Motion to Strike or, in the alternative, for leave to file supplemental brief in support of opposition to plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 21 Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 19 ORDER Striking 4 plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment on Preliminary Injunction and 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.