Rowe v. Bauman
Petitioner: Monte William Rowe
Respondent: Catherine S. Bauman
Case Number: 2:2016cv11350
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Alger
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Cleland
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Stafford
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
January 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION and ORDER Denying Respondent's 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Staying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (SBur)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowe v. Bauman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Monte William Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Catherine S. Bauman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?