Davis v. Commissioner
Plaintiff: Terri E Davis
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
Case Number: 2:2016cv11601
Filed: May 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Marianne O. Battani
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 19 Report and Recommendation, 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Terri E Davis, 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security Commissioner Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (KDoa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri E Davis
Represented By: Robert F. Samoray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
Represented By: Christopher L. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?