Nickowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Thomas Nickowski
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2016cv11814
Filed: May 21, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: Marianne O. Battani
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING 23 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS 17 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (KDoa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nickowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Nickowski
Represented By: Joshua L. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?