Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jeffery S Rose
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2016cv12622
Filed: July 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Saginaw
Presiding Judge: Sean F. Cox
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT [141, 15], GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT 20 , AND AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE ALJ. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (EBut)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery S Rose
Represented By: Lewis M. Seward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Represented By: Amy C. Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?