Midgyett v. Jackson
Petitioner: Gregory Midgyett
Respondent: Shane Jackson
Case Number: 2:2017cv13846
Filed: November 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Montcalm
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: Anthony P. Patti
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS MOTION TO HOLD RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT (Doc. 9)AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO MAIL A COPY OF THE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Midgyett v. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Midgyett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shane Jackson
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?