Ford Motor Company v. Cena
Plaintiff: Ford Motor Company
Defendant: John Cena
Case Number: 2:2017cv13876
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Arthur J Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
June 4, 2018 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Hearing on 6/5/2018 is Cancelled re #13 Notice of Hearing on Motion. (CPic)
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CORRECTED SCHEDULING ORDER: Witnesses to be exchanged by 6/1/2018, Discovery Motions to be filed by 11/7/2018, Discovery due by 12/7/2018, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/7/2019, Joint Final Pretrial Order due 4/3/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/10/2019 02:30 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MLan)
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Witnesses to be exchanged by 6/1/2018, Discovery Motions to be filed by 11/7/2018, Discovery due by 12/7/2018, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/7/2019, Joint Final Pretrial Order due 4/3/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/10/2019 02:30 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MLan)
March 26, 2018 Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow: Scheduling Conference held on 3/26/2018. (MLan)
March 20, 2018 Filing 14 REPLY to Response re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION to Strike filed by John Cena. (Hull, Bryan)
March 14, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING on #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, MOTION to Strike. Motion Hearing set for 6/5/2018 03:30 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
March 6, 2018 Filing 12 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION to Strike filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A. Program Terms and Conditions, #3 Exhibit B. Affidavit of Eligibility and Release, #4 Exhibit C. Ford GT Order Confirmation, #5 Exhibit D. Unpublished Cases) (Brown, Lisa)
February 26, 2018 Filing 11 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Ford Motor Company (Chang, Jong-Ju)
February 15, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 3/26/2018 03:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (CPic)
February 13, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, MOTION to Strike by John Cena. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Buyers Order, Agreement & Vehicle Information Form) (Hull, Bryan)
February 13, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan David Hull on behalf of John Cena. (Hull, Bryan)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Response to #1 Complaint Response due by 2/13/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
January 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER and Confidentiality Agreement. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
January 30, 2018 Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jennifer M. Grieco appearing on behalf of John Cena (Grieco, Jennifer)
December 7, 2017 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. John Cena waiver sent on 12/6/2017, answer due 2/5/2018. (Chang, Jong-Ju)
December 4, 2017 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A. Brown on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Brown, Lisa)
December 1, 2017 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *John Cena* (Krause, S)
December 1, 2017 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (Krause, S)
November 30, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ford Motor Company against John Cena. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6499161 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne County - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, 2:17-cv-02481, Judge Judge William B. Shubb] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Program Terms and Conditions, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Eligibility and Release, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Order Confirmation) (Chang, Jong-Ju)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ford Motor Company v. Cena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Cena
Represented By: Jennifer M. Grieco
Represented By: Bryan David Hull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Jong-Ju Chang
Represented By: Lisa A. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?