Waskul v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff: Carl Waskul
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2017cv13932
Filed: December 6, 2017
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Office: Detroit Office
County: Washtenaw
Presiding Judge: Sean F. Cox
Referring Judge: Mona K. Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2018 13 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Dkt. 7 )and Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 3 ). Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (Sandusky, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waskul v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Waskul
Represented By: Ryan A. Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Kenneth P. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?