Coffelt v. Nelnet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joshua Coffelt
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv13247
Filed: October 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Mark A Goldsmith
Referring Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadline ( Answer due by 12/3/2018). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
November 13, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ahmad T. Sulaiman on behalf of Joshua Coffelt. (Sulaiman, Ahmad)
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
November 9, 2018 Filing 8 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, and Order Extending Deadline to Answer by Nelnet, Inc. (Jerabek, Marc) Modified on 11/9/2018 (Sandusky, K).
November 9, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc P. Jerabek on behalf of Nelnet, Inc.. (Jerabek, Marc)
November 5, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Nelnet, Inc. served on 10/22/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (Davidson, Joseph)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Regarding Certification Requirements. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
October 17, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Nelnet, Inc.* (EKar)
October 17, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ahmad T. Sulaiman on behalf of Joshua Coffelt. (Sulaiman, Ahmad) Modified on 10/17/2018 (EKar). [APPEARANCE IS ON BEHALF OF NELNET, INC.]
October 17, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Scott Davidson on behalf of Joshua Coffelt. (Davidson, Joseph)
October 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joshua Coffelt against Nelnet, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6950361 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Davidson, Joseph)
October 17, 2018 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (EKar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coffelt v. Nelnet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc.
Represented By: Ahmad T. Sulaiman
Represented By: Marc P. Jerabek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Coffelt
Represented By: Joseph Scott Davidson
Represented By: Ahmad T. Sulaiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?