Hanley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Christa Hanley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2018cv13376
Filed: October 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Anthony P Patti
Referring Judge: Arthur J Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT of Social Security Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Admin record - 002, #2 Document Continuation Admin record - 003, #3 Document Continuation Admin record - 004, #4 Document Continuation Admin record - 005, #5 Document Continuation Admin record - 006, #6 Document Continuation Admin record - 007, #7 Document Continuation Admin record - 008, #8 Document Continuation Admin record - 009, #9 Document Continuation Admin record - 010) (Mays, Vanessa)
December 21, 2018 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Mays, Vanessa)
December 21, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy C. Bland on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Bland, Amy)
November 26, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christa Hanley (Bender, Jacob)
November 6, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Commissioner of Social Security Administration * (DTyl)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs.**CLERKS OFFICE TO ISSUE SUMMONS**--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) Modified on 11/5/2018 (MWil).
October 29, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Referral of Social Security Case to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (DWor)
October 29, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Christa Hanley. (Bender, Jacob)
October 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christa Hanley against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Plaintiff requests summons issued. IFP Application to Follow. County of 1st Plaintiff: Monroe - County Where Action Arose: Monroe - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial) (Bender, Jacob)
October 29, 2018 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christa Hanley
Represented By: Jacob Conrad Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Vanessa Miree Mays
Represented By: Amy C. Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?