Ferguson v. Whorly et al
Darryl Ferguson |
Arron Whorly, Riverview, City of and Ron Miller |
2:2018cv14047 |
December 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
George Caram Steeh |
Civil Rights: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from U.S. Marshal Service of Receipt of Service of Process Documents. (DPer) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Ron Miller, Riverview, City of, Arron Whorly* (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Document Continuation) (DPer) |
Filing 6 Notice to Plaintiff Regarding Service of Process (MBea) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and granting request for service by the U.S. Marshal. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, #6 Notice to Plaintiff Regarding Service of Process and Recommendation to Consult with Detroit Mercy Law Pro Se Clinic on Darryl Ferguson at 20150 Fort St., Apt. 104, Riverview, MI 48193. (MBea) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Darryl Ferguson. (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darryl Ferguson against Ron Miller, Riverview, City of, Arron Whorly. (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.