Berry v. United States Attorney General et al
| Duane L. Berry |
| John Does and United States Attorney General |
| 2:2019cv10155 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing Without Prejudice the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 . Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #8 Opinion & Order on Duane L. Berry Pris. No. 90937, 38742 Bramham, Clinton Township, MI 48038 (JCur) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for order to show cause or issuance of writ by Duane L. Berry. (DPer) |
| Filing 6 JUDICIAL NOTICE of expanding the record by Duane L. Berry (DPer) |
| Filing 5 PETITION for non-disclosure order by Duane L. Berry. (DPer) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for evidentiary hearing and appointment of counsel by Duane L. Berry. (DPer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Duane L. Berry. (DPer) |
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Duane L. Berry against John Does, United States Attorney General, Receipt No: DET119732 - Fee: $ 5. (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
