Jarrett v. Terrell
Ernest L Jarrett and Ernest L. Jarrett, P.C. |
Law Office of Sharon J. Brunner, Sharon J. Brunner, James S. Terrell and Law Office of James S. Terrell |
2:2019cv10578 |
February 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Anthony P Patti |
Arthur J Tarnow |
Contract: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Strike #7 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by All Defendants. (Frank, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #7 Reply to Response to Motion, by All Plaintiffs. (Jarrett, Ernest) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING on #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Change Venue. Motion Hearing set for 7/17/2019 03:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Change Venue filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Frank, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Change Venue filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A thru E) (Jarrett, Ernest) |
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow: Status Conference held on 3/28/2019 as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Change Venue: Response due by 4/18/2019. (MLan) |
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Status Conference set for 3/28/2019 03:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SET FOR 3/19/2019 IS CANCELLED. DEFENDANTS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO APPEAR BUT SHOULD BE AVAILABLE BY TELEPHONE. (MLan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 3/19/2019 11:00 AM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Response to #3 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 4/9/2019. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Change Venue by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Frank, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Notice of Removal, by All Defendants (Frank, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 19-001772-CZ. Receipt No: 0645-7124778 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Frank, Jonathan) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.