Roach v. Ford Motor Company
| Terrence Roach |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2019cv10845 |
| March 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David M Lawson |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATED ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)
|
| Filing 10 Defendant's WITNESS LIST by Ford Motor Company (Lengnick, Sonja) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's WITNESS LIST by Terrence Roach (Greco, David) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER PHASE I: Settlement Conference set for 1/7/2020 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (Refer to image for additional dates) (LVer)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Victoria A. Roberts: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 5/7/2019. (LVer) |
| Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Greco, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2019 at 3:30 PM before District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (see image for details and dates) (LVer) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Ford Motor Company. (Lengnick, Sonja) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Recusal and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge David M. Lawson to District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth P. Hardy on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Hardy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Ford Motor Company (Lengnick, Sonja) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 19-002372-CD. Receipt No: 0645-7165346 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Lengnick, Sonja) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roach v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terrence Roach | |
| Represented By: | David F. Greco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Sonja L. Lengnick |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth P. Hardy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
