Hi-Tech Auto Service, Inc. v. Allen Park, City of et al
Timothy Martin Jenkins and Hi-Tech Auto Service, Inc. |
David Boomer, Allen Park, City of and Tania Jett |
2:2019cv11503 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Regarding Certification Requirements. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Thomas M. Loeb appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs as Co-Counsel (Loeb, Thomas) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Tania Jett* (DWor) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *David Boomer* (DWor) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Allen Park, City of* (DWor) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7250318 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Boylan, Karie) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.