Carter v. University of Texas at Dallas et al
| Geaniece D. Carter and Geaniece D Carter [E-filer] |
| University of Texas at Dallas, George Fair, Barbara Ashmore and Carolyn Bray |
| 2:2019cv12381 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Paul D Borman |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S #16 Motion to Disqualify Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #14 Motion to Amend/Correct- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
| Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Carolyn Bray, Barbara Ashmore, George Fair, University of Texas at Dallas - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER Requiring Response to #17 Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff's Response due by 10/28/2019 - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #16 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Barbara Ashmore, Carolyn Bray, George Fair, University of Texas at Dallas. (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 17 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Barbara Ashmore, Carolyn Bray, George Fair, University of Texas at Dallas. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support) (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel by All Plaintiffs. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct by All Plaintiffs. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by All Plaintiffs. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Carter [E-filer], Geaniece) Modified on 9/23/2019 (SSch). [DOCUMENT IS A RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Brief Supporting MTD filed by Barbara Ashmore, Carolyn Bray, George Fair, University of Texas at Dallas. (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Barbara Ashmore, Carolyn Bray, George Fair, University of Texas at Dallas. (Attachments: #1 Prop Order) (Graydon, Scot) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from U.S. Marshal Service of Receipt of Service of Process Documents. (NAhm) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (NAhm) |
| Pro Se E-filing Account Created for Geaniece D Carter [E-filer]. (NAhm) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se Application for E-filing submitted by Geaniece D Carter [E-filer] [APPROVED] (NAhm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and granting request for service by the U.S. Marshal. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Geaniece D. Carter at P.O. Box 361184, Grosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236. (DTof) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Geaniece D. Carter. (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Geaniece D. Carter against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
