Minnick v. Columbia Township et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Minnick
Defendant: Jay Niles and Columbia Township
Case Number: 2:2019cv12597
Filed: September 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 11/19/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Avern Cohn (MVer)
October 22, 2019 Filing 10 RESPONSE to #9 Answer to Complaint Response to Affirmative Defenses by Shawn Minnick. (Cabot, Shawn)
October 21, 2019 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Reliance on Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Dangl, Lindsay)
October 2, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT TO OCTOBER 24, 2019 Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
October 1, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Lindsay N. Dangl appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Dangl, Lindsay)
October 1, 2019 Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT by All Defendants (Dangl, Lindsay)
September 18, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Jay Niles served on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. (Cabot, Shawn)
September 18, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Columbia Township served on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. (Cabot, Shawn)
September 5, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Jay Niles* (SOso)
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Columbia Township* (SOso)
September 5, 2019 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SOso)
September 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shawn Minnick against Columbia Township, Jay Niles with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7391719 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Jackson - County Where Action Arose: Jackson - County of 1st Defendant: Jackson. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Cabot, Shawn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minnick v. Columbia Township et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Niles
Represented By: Lindsay N. Dangl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Columbia Township
Represented By: Lindsay N. Dangl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Minnick
Represented By: Shawn C. Cabot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?