State of California v. Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd. et al
| State of California |
| Aisin Automotive Casting LLC and Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd. |
| 2:2019cv12672 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Marianne O Battani |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by State of California (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Settlement Agreement) (Banerjee, Anik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages, Civil Penalties, and Injunctive Relief filed by State of California against All Defendants with Jury Demand. No summons requested. Receipt No: 0645-7400497 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): United States District Court for Eastern District Court of Michigan, 12-md-02311, Judge Hon. Marianne O. Battani] (Banerjee, Anik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
