Berry v. United States of America
Verenda Berry |
United States of America |
2:2019cv12766 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David M Lawson |
Linda V Parker |
Anthony P Patti |
R Steven Whalen |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Linda V. Parker: Status Conference held on 11/15/2019. Disposition: By January 15, 2020, the parties shall submit to the Court, the documents that were discussed during the Status Conference. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (RLou) |
Filing 9 STIPULATED ORDER Setting Deadline to Answer Complaint (Responsive Pleading due by 12/6/2019). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick James Lanciotti on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Lanciotti, Patrick) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Rey on behalf of United States of America. (Rey, Eric) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael L. Williams on behalf of United States of America. (Williams, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 11/15/2019 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker (RLou) |
Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge David M. Lawson and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti to District Judge Linda V. Parker and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (DWor) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *United States of America* (DWor) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Verenda Berry against United States of America with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7414773 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: Lansing. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): Eastern District of Michigan, 18-cv-10243, Judge Hon. Linda V. Parker] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Shkolnik, Hunter) Modified on 9/23/2019 (SOso). |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Berry v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Verenda Berry | |
Represented By: | Hunter Shkolnik |
Represented By: | Patrick James Lanciotti |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Michael L. Williams |
Represented By: | Eric Rey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.