Davis v. 3 Brothers Auto Sales, Inc. et al
| Carolyn Davis |
| Credit Acceptance Corporation and 3 Brothers Auto Sales, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv13547 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| George Caram Steeh |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Credit Acceptance Corporation Notice of Settlement (King, Stephen) |
Filing 3
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Credit Acceptance to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Response due by 12/26/2019. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
|
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Carolyn Davis (Taub, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Credit Acceptance Corporation from 36th District Court, case number 19-175528. Receipt No: 0645-7506563 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (King, Stephen) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
