Joseph v. United States of America
| United States of America |
| raymond frank joseph |
| 2:2019cv13583 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by raymond frank joseph (Thompson, William) |
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER for the Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel. Attorney Venar R. Ayar terminated. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING #7 Stipulation filed by raymond frank joseph. See, R11 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures for the EDMI, available as an Appendix to this District's Local Rules. Issued by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
| Filing 7 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION for Substitution of Counsel by raymond frank joseph (Thompson, William) Modified on 1/13/2020 (AChu). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William L. Thompson on behalf of raymond frank joseph. (Thompson, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Newby on behalf of United States of America. (Newby, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Nemeth on behalf of raymond frank joseph. (Nemeth, Eric) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *United States of America* (RBog) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of $400 by raymond frank joseph - Receipt No. DET127411 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 12/16/2019 (DAll) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 PETITION TO QUASH SUMMONS filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Ayar, Venar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joseph v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: raymond frank joseph | |
| Represented By: | Venar R. Ayar |
| Represented By: | William L. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Eric Nemeth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. Newby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
