Dearborn Golden Investments LLC vs. Uppercut Bros LLC, et al
| Dearborn Golden Investments LLC |
| Abbas Bazzy, Uppercut Bros LLC and Randy Youhan |
| 2:2019cv13727 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Paul D Borman |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Real Property: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs Dearborn Golden Investments LLC (Bajorek, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Randy Youhan* (SOso) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Uppercut Bros LLC* (SOso) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Abbas Bazzy* (SOso) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Uppercut Bros LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7532397 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Bajorek, Ronald) |
| Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendants Abbas Bazzy, Randy Youhan. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Complaint,, Plaintiff requests summons issued. (Bajorek, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
