DDLI Logistics LLC v. Metalsa SA de CV et al
| DDLI Logistics LLC a limited liability company Doing business as American Rail Center Logistics |
| Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated and Metalsa SA de CV |
| 2:2020cv11872 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Linda V Parker |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Mutual Confidentiality and Non-Use Agreement) (Danek, Brad)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Denying as Moot the #10 Motion to Dismiss. An #12 Amended Complaint was filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by DDLI Logistics LLC. (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by DDLI Logistics LLC against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Agreement) (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 11
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated (Sharkey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Mutual Confidentiality and Non-Use Agreement) (Danek, Brad)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Brad A. Danek on behalf of Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated. (Danek, Brad)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel N. Sharkey on behalf of Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated. (Sharkey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by DDLI Logistics LLC re #4 Order to Show Cause, #1 Complaint,, (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response to the #4 Order to Show Cause is due by 7/27/2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Order to Show Cause by DDLI Logistics LLC. (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 5
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by DDLI Logistics LLC (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 7/24/2020. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *Metalsa Structural Products, Incorporated* (DWor)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *Metalsa SA de CV* (DWor)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7915808 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of Country. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Agreement) (Wagoner, Gregory)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
