Muzamhindo v. Nagy et al
| Tinashe Josphate Muzamhindo |
| Cary M Johnson, Noah Nagy, Jane Doe, Russell Rurka, Floyd Hill and Schulte P Daniel |
| 2:2020cv12529 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service by Schulte P Daniel, Cary M Johnson, Noah Nagy, Russell Rurka. (Marcum, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss , Brief in Support, with Exhibit A, and Certificate of Service by Noah Nagy, Russell Rurka. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Frazier v Michigan (CA 6 July 22 2002)) (Marcum, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joshua D. Marcum appearing on behalf of Schulte P Daniel, Cary M Johnson, Noah Nagy, Russell Rurka (Marcum, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Schulte P Daniel, Floyd Hill, Cary M Johnson, Noah Nagy, Russell Rurka* (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tinashe Josphate Muzamhindo against Tinashe Josphate Muzamhindo with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8047719 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Jackson - County of 1st Defendant: Jackson. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Nunley, Royce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
