Hill v. Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office et al
Plaintiff: Armon E Hill
Defendant: Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office and Brian Mackie
Case Number: 2:2020cv12537
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Linda V Parker
Referring Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office waiver sent on 10/5/2020, answer due 12/4/2020. (Webster-Cox, Dionne)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Brian Mackie waiver sent on 10/5/2020, answer due 12/4/2020. (Webster-Cox, Dionne)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel C. Bryant on behalf of Brian Mackie, Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office. (Bryant, Joel)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sonal H. Mithani on behalf of Brian Mackie, Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office. (Mithani, Sonal)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 [FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT] ANSWER to Complaint First Amended Complaint by Armon E Hill. (Webster-Cox, Dionne) Modified on 10/6/2020 (RLou).
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Brian Mackie* (DPer)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office* (DPer)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Armon E Hill against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8048378 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transcript) (Webster-Cox, Dionne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Armon E Hill
Represented By: Dionne E Webster-Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washtenaw County Prosecutor's Office
Represented By: Sonal H. Mithani
Represented By: Joel C. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Mackie
Represented By: Sonal H. Mithani
Represented By: Joel C. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?